Why you can trust TechRadar We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you're buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
CPU Rendering performance
Cinebench R10: Seconds – quicker is better
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 53
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 54
Cinebench R11 Index
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 4.82
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 4.77
Video encoding
X264 v3 (frames per second)
Pass1 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 68.40
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 66.252
Pass2 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 26.37
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 25.91
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
X264 v2 (fps)
Pass1 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 75.180
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 72.495
Pass2 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 27.000
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 26.507
Graphics (HD5830 single and Crossfire)
Far Cry 2 (small ranch map, 4xFSAA, Ultra settings, avr fps)
Single card:
1680 x 1050: 64.99
1920 x 1200: 41.99
CrossFire:
1680 x 1050: 89.41
1920 x 1200: 76.22
DiRT2 (4xFSAA, Ultra settings)
Single card:
1680 x 1050: 64.30
1920 x 1200: 56.58
CrossFire:
1680 x 1050: 113.93
1920 x 1200: 99.83
Just Cause 2 (Dark Tower benchmark, 4xFSAA, 8xAscF)
Single card:
1680 x 1050: 46.74
1920 x 1200: 40.12
Crossfire:
1680 x 1050: 59.30
1920 x 1200: 50.68
Overclocking – Intel 920 overclocked to 3.6GHz
CPU Rendering performance
Cinebench R10: Seconds – quicker is better
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 42
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 42
Cinebench R11 Index
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 6.07
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 6.08
Video Encoding
X264 v3 (fps)
Pass1 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 85.47
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 84.17
Pass2 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 33.05
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 32.89
X264 v2 (fps)
Pass1 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 93.872
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 92.790
Pass2 (avr 4 runs)
Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI: 31.027
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R: 30.160
Lab report
The FlamingBlade GTI's BIOS made it very easy to overclock, with as many tweaks and adjustments to various bits of motherboard hardware as you'd find on a board costing twice as much.
The fact that we could only get the Intel 920 we used to run at 3.6GHz is more the fickle nature of that particular chip rather than a limitation of the board.
Current page: Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI review: Benchmarks
Prev Page Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI review: Specifications Next Page Foxconn FlamingBlade GTI review: VerdictThe TechRadar hive mind. The Megazord. The Voltron. When our powers combine, we become 'TECHRADAR STAFF'. You'll usually see this author name when the entire team has collaborated on a project or an article, whether that's a run-down ranking of our favorite Marvel films, or a round-up of all the coolest things we've collectively seen at annual tech shows like CES and MWC. We are one.