Interview: where next for Photoshop?

JM: Not necessarily, no. Thus far our focus has been on listening to requests from consumers about making the software easy to use. So we've done things like improving selections by creating 'smart surround', which checks what each pixel looks like in comparison to the surrounding pixels as a way to approximate an object. There were tools in previous versions that were very much based just on colour, but now we're able to take into account the colour, lighting and contrast of the surrounding pixels to do a way better job at figuring out what the object is. So our focus, thus far, has been on making processing easy in our software. If that extra processing is a decision that the consumer thinks about at the time of capture, then we certainly have nothing against that being done at the time of capture. One statement our customers – probably not surprisingly – agree with is that the majority of the fun and the majority of the value of a photograph comes after the time of capture. That's not really surprising given that these people are our customers, using our software. But agreement with that statement is something that we've seen increasing over time. The consumers who are shooting every day are freed, if you will, by the post-processing aspect. I can just snap the photo and I know if it's not the proper exposure, I can deal with it later. Some people cringe at that. The artistry of the capture might be lessened for those individuals. But everything in our business is about segmenting the customer base; and general consumers think very, very differently to pro photographers.

TR: I'm curious what your thoughts are on the web. When will we see a full-blown photo- editing application running out on the cloud?